Book a walkthrough
Sign in

Every expert, remembered properly.

Denua groups your matters by expert so you can see where a specialist has appeared before, who instructed them, and how their evidence was treated.

Grouped by expert

Matters and accepted findings collected under each expert name.

Instructing party

Know whether they were your expert, theirs, or single joint.

Treatment recorded

How the evidence was received is captured, not remembered.

Assessments kept

Your own read on an expert stays with the record for next time.

Honest labelling

Counts are shown as findings in those matters - never as findings attributed to the expert.

Cross-matter

The value appears once a firm has history; Denua reads across it for you.

Instruct on record, not recollection.

The question before instructing is always the same: have we used them, and how did it go? Denua already has the answer.

Track record

Never instruct an expert blind again

Before the instruction letter goes out, you can see every matter the expert is named on, who instructed them and the accepted findings in those matters - with honest labelling of what the count does and does not mean.

  • Avoid the expert your firm quietly regretted last year.
  • Know whether they were yours, theirs, or single joint.
Expert · record4 matters
Dr M. Okonjo — quantum surveying
Single joint ×1
Ashcroft v Halliwell
Instructed by us · 2024
14 findings in matter
Nord Ltd v Petra SA
Instructed by opponent · 2023
9 findings in matter
Re Vance
Single joint expert · 2022
6 findings in matter
Counts are findings in those matters — not findings attributed to the expert.
Assessment

Your firm's experience outlives the conversation

How the evidence was treated, and your own read on the expert, are stored against the record - so the next team gets the firm's judgement instead of hoping the right person is still in the building.

  • Partner-level judgement available to whoever picks up the file.
  • Nothing important lives only in a corridor chat or a lost email.
Treatment & assessmentRetained on the record
Evidence treatmentPreferred in part
Cross-examinationHeld up on methodology
Assessed byA. Rowley · Mar 2024
“Strong on measured survey; slow on supplemental reports — build the timetable around it.”
Reinstruct
Firm view
Yes, with caveat
Consistent

Nothing new for the team to learn

Specialist memory behaves exactly like counterparty memory - same grouping, same citations, same honesty about coverage - so adoption costs a firm nothing in training.

  • One mental model across opponents and experts.
  • Value grows automatically as your matter history grows.
Same shape as counterparty memoryNothing new to learn
Counterparty
Group · cite · caveat
Specialist
Group · cite · caveat
Grouping
By name across matters
Identical
Citation
Back to accepted findings
Identical
Coverage
Unmatched items reported
Identical
Per expert
Matter and finding history
3
Instructing-party positions
Retained
Assessments across matters

Instruct with your firm's memory behind you.

See the history before the letter goes out.

Book a walkthroughContact us